<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EMNLP Slides</title>
	<link>http://blog.crowdflower.com/2008/11/emnlp-slides/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brendan O'Connor</title>
		<link>http://blog.crowdflower.com/2008/11/emnlp-slides/#comment-733</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan O'Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 19:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.crowdflower.com/2008/11/emnlp-slides/#comment-733</guid>
		<description>Heather, thanks for posting this.  We haven't done too much with other metrics yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heather, thanks for posting this.  We haven&#8217;t done too much with other metrics yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather Piwowar</title>
		<link>http://blog.crowdflower.com/2008/11/emnlp-slides/#comment-732</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather Piwowar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.crowdflower.com/2008/11/emnlp-slides/#comment-732</guid>
		<description>Great paper.  Timely, helpful, and thorough.

Thanks also for the continued descriptions of your work on your blog.

I've also been playing with Mech Turk for annotations.  Not sure if you've looked at other metrics for reliability and generalizability of annotations, beyond correlations?  I've got a blog post &lt;a href="http://researchremix.wordpress.com/2008/12/29/generalizability-coefficient-for-mechanical-turk-annotations/" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; with rough notes on using the generalizability coefficient... comments are most welcome, and feel free to run with the ideas if they are helpful.
Heather</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great paper.  Timely, helpful, and thorough.</p>
<p>Thanks also for the continued descriptions of your work on your blog.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also been playing with Mech Turk for annotations.  Not sure if you&#8217;ve looked at other metrics for reliability and generalizability of annotations, beyond correlations?  I&#8217;ve got a blog post <a href="http://researchremix.wordpress.com/2008/12/29/generalizability-coefficient-for-mechanical-turk-annotations/" rel="nofollow">here</a> with rough notes on using the generalizability coefficient&#8230; comments are most welcome, and feel free to run with the ideas if they are helpful.<br />
Heather</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://blog.crowdflower.com/2008/11/emnlp-slides/#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 16:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.crowdflower.com/2008/11/emnlp-slides/#comment-659</guid>
		<description>Nice post. Thank you for the info. Keep it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post. Thank you for the info. Keep it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cesar B. aka the Mover</title>
		<link>http://blog.crowdflower.com/2008/11/emnlp-slides/#comment-636</link>
		<dc:creator>Cesar B. aka the Mover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 23:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.crowdflower.com/2008/11/emnlp-slides/#comment-636</guid>
		<description>This Blog reminds me the reason I like bloging so much, the interaction is very important with readers and you guys have it right. Looks great too, will be back for more posts, David the mover. : - )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Blog reminds me the reason I like bloging so much, the interaction is very important with readers and you guys have it right. Looks great too, will be back for more posts, David the mover. : - )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
